Current:Home > StocksTesla lawsuit challenging Louisiana ban on direct car sales from plants revived by appeals court -FutureFinance
Tesla lawsuit challenging Louisiana ban on direct car sales from plants revived by appeals court
View
Date:2025-04-14 06:39:42
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Tesla’s federal court challenge to a Louisiana law that prohibits automobile manufacturers from selling directly to consumers has been revived by an appeals court.
The lawsuit by the electric car company owned by billionaire Elon Musk is part of a broader effort in multiple states to circumvent laws that bar vehicle manufacturers from also being retailers. The effort includes court challenges and, in some cases, opening showrooms on sovereign Native American tribal properties where state laws don’t apply.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling, reversed a lower court ruling dismissing a Tesla claim that it was being denied constitutional due process of law. The appeals court said Tesla had made a plausible claim that the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission, which governs car sales in the state, was biased against Tesla, noting that it’s dominated by licensed third-party dealers.
“The Commission will always be incentivized to exclude new business models from entering the market,” Judge Jerry Smith wrote for the majority in the ruling issued Monday.
The ruling sends the case back to the federal district court in New Orleans.
Smith was appointed to the court by former Republican President Ronald Reagan. Judge Catharina Haynes, appointed by former Republican President George W. Bush agreed with the result. Dissenting was Judge Dana Douglas, appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden.
“The Supreme Court has clarified that regulatory boards are not unconstitutional merely because they are composed of competitors of the entities they regulate,” Douglas wrote.
veryGood! (36)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- How a Contrarian Scientist Helped Trump’s EPA Defy Mainstream Science
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- Save $20 on these Reviewed-approved noise-canceling headphones at Amazon
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Trump Admin. Halts Mountaintop Mining Health Risks Study by National Academies
- Julia Fox Frees the Nipple in See-Through Glass Top at Cannes Film Festival 2023
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- The improbable fame of a hijab-wearing teen rapper from a poor neighborhood in Mumbai
Ranking
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Exxon Promises to Cut Methane Leaks from U.S. Shale Oil and Gas Operations
- Diet culture can hurt kids. This author advises parents to reclaim the word 'fat'
- U.S. Coast Guard search for American Ryan Proulx suspended after he went missing near Bahamas shipwreck
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- Is gray hair reversible? A new study digs into the root cause of aging scalps
Recommendation
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
How 90 Big Companies Helped Fuel Climate Change: Study Breaks It Down
What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
MLB trade deadline tracker: Will Angels deal Shohei Ohtani?
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Fear of pregnancy: One teen's story in post-Roe America
Idaho Murders Case: Judge Enters Not Guilty Plea for Bryan Kohberger
From Antarctica to the Oceans, Climate Change Damage Is About to Get a Lot Worse, IPCC Warns